Of the problem the basic value that putting forward democracy is civilized society, it is the great achievement of recent politics civilization, it is the political philosophy of different country, different ideological consensus, "Democracy already became the political target with whole world main first class. " since ① is latter-day, chinese people for democracy advance wave upon wave, made tremendous sacrifice. But, democratic system still is returned very not perfect. However, pass 20 old economy to reform in Chinese people, the economy that created Chinese throughout history booms, people longs to develop democracy further, when seeking more extensive freedom, an academic thoughts that turns over democracy rises sadly, since it and past are long-term with " national condition is talked " the theory that rejects democracy is confluent, become current China to develop the serious obstacle of socialistic democracy. The person that talk democratically instead mixes to democratic misrepresentation critically and main have the following theory: It is " democratic danger is talked " . In recent years the theory that some scholars did not know why to give a democratic risk because of n/med the process of preparing Chinese medicine, fiercely assail is democratic. They think, so called democracy is most deterministic (they its abbreviation " most definitely " ) , this kind " most definitely " the system can be brought about " the despotic rule of most person " . ② returns somebody to think, chinese economy is reformed now, the society flourishs, appeared estate of a few wealthy person, if get democracy, appear " the despotic rule of most person " , the belongings of a few wealthy person can be encroached, destroy social prosperity. This kind of theory solves democracy as a result of one-sided wrong even geography, from go up at all the value that denies democracy. 2 be " democracy is harmful theory " . Think although democracy is good cause, but China does not suit to get democracy currently, china is current and main the target is development economy, raise people's living standard. Democracy goes against social stability, influence efficiency. Develop for economy, stability is crushing all, efficiency is preferential. So, china should pursue authoritative creed, is not democratic. What reform in economy recently especially is at issue, some scholars think, if want to say democracy now, reform cannot advance. Because, the person that in reform the interest is damaged will be reactionary, if state-owned company reform wants to have come off sentry duty of a lot of people, say democracy, reform is not done. ③ although this one theory does not deny democratic value completely, but thinking democracy is in current China must not go. 3 be " citizen quality is talked " or " national condition is talked " . This is the theory that familiar to the ear can disapprove of China one set of detailed to develop democracy currently. They are oral the struggling target that going up to also say democracy is a country, but exaggerate again the condition that realizes democracy. Chinese mouth is numerous, economy is underdeveloped, citizen quality is low, especially 900 million farmer is waited a moment, so, chinese national condition decides that he cannot get democracy now. This one theory is oral go up admiring also democracy, but excuse " citizen quality " and " national condition is talked " push it to never-failing future again. These theory or it is to stem from academic bias, or it is to stem from interest place be puzzled, make democracy becomes sinister in appearance innocently of purpose, perhaps make it becomes Yao cannot be reached. Look in them, china cannot get democracy, at least China cannot get democracy now, democratic perhaps should amble. Chinese people fought more than 100 years for democratic ideal, moving toward the globalization of rich, trend, China that moves toward modern culture, otherwise should do democracy to become an issue again unexpectedly! Accordingly, special be necessary democratic to all sorts of bring shame on, misrepresentation wrong theory tries to clarify, take the resolution of the way that democratization develops with sturdy China. One, after all what is democratic? Why be democracy? It is the issue that makes extremely confused by person democratically instead. They say democracy is an election, democracy is " most definitely " , democracy is elite decision-making, etc. To make it clear that pair of democracy are intended innocently misinterpret, be necessary to be made to democracy and develop the history theoretically to do democratically a few comb. We know, democracy makes generation at Gu Xila. The democracy of ancient Greek creation (the power that Democracy) means people. Gu Xila executes direct democracy to make, at that time the citizen congress of city-state by year full all male citizen composition of 18 years old, citizen congress has final power to make decisions to national policy, archon arises by citizen congress election, 500 people of Athens have a special committee to be in charge of holding citizen plenary meeting in the conference, biennially is held partly. If have need, also can hold nonsked special meeting. Conference program discusses by 500 people conference. Any citizens can go up to make a speech freely in citizen congress, everybody makes a decision with the means that raise one's hand votes. So, yalishiduode is in his classic work " politics " in it is the amount proceed with from gubernatorial number to the analysis of regime, the system that is in office one person calls monarch to control system of government; The system that the small number of people is in office says the noble controls system of government; The system that most person is in office calls democracy to control system of government. Visible, in Gu Xila, democracy regards system of a kind of state as configuration, it points to a kind of most person's regnant political power namely, ④ is a kind of simple and direct democratic form, people since is gubernatorial, it is the ruled. Contemporary and democratic system is creation of recent the capitalist class. Bourgeois democracy is to build the representative democracy that waits for principle foundation to go up in bond of natural law, society and connate human rights. Representative democracy has been different from Gu Xila period is simple " most person is regnant " direct democracy is made, make democracy however build go up in a kind of complex political influence structural frame. Representative democracy is built in it is a foundation with equal, free election, follow the following principle: The regnant principle of people dominion, most person; ⑤ democracy needs elite processing, in order to arrest most person low, ⑥ executes minute of authority and restricted principle to force of most human rights consequently; ⑦ democracy must be influence disperse and of diversity. ⑧ these are bourgeois democracy makes built important jumping-off place. It is certain to if found the representative democracy of period to bourgeois,be done justice if, that is people pass general election the generation, government that belongs to people dominion, the government implements minute of power regnant, mutual make judge, in order to prevent the abuse of influence and most person or any individuals' star-chamber system of government. The direct democracy person of ancient Greek and simple majority makes democracy of recent the capitalist class, change becomes vote of a most person, the small number of people is ruling, execute minute of authority to make judge representative democracy. The regime of the 3 authority schism of the parliamentary dominion that the typical and democratic system that builds according to these academic compose is England and United States. Marxism democracy is watched is a kind of thoroughly latitudinarian democratic view, he tries to break through the national system at that time, creation is made more more extensively than bourgeois with advanced democracy. The democratic and academic deep of Marx results from bourgeois is representative democratic, special the person democracy advantageous position that comes from Yulusuo is academic, the absolutely will that emphasizes people and right are consummate. The Marxism returns extraordinary proposition to build the democratic system on equal foundation, basically be with producing a material equality is a foundation, build by people more direct share governmental government (discuss a syncretic) , the system that be supervised effectively and controls a government (of people supervise unmake authority) . Domestic Huntington points out American famous politics, the progress that latter-day democracy makes experienced " triple wave " tide: The first only then at 19 centuries 20 time, enlarge major male to be a mark with American suffrage. This one lasts to 20 centuries all the time 20 time, there are 29 democratic countries to appear about during. The first refluent or go against tide only then 1922, appearance by Italian Mosuolini till 1942 till. The 2nd democratic only then win at allied forces of Second World War, achieved fastigium 1962, democratic regime increases 36. Came 1962 1970 for you the 2nd low ebb, the amount of democratic regime reduces 30. However, since 1974, democratic triple wave already made democratic regime increased about 30 again, enlarged original amount one times -- had not included the political revolution that in Russia and Africa at present a few places produce inside. The progress that ⑨ democracy makes is not plain sailing, it sufferred serious setback in the world war that twice capitalist crisis causes, especially 20 centuries 20 time of the 3rd Caesarean Nazi arisen, the despotic rule of most person caused serious disaster to the mankind. "Democratic " the dangerous sex that shows it, afterwar people causes the profundity of pair of democratic systems to think over from this. These reviewing make people had new knowledge to representative democracy, this is unconstitutional of system of the development that examines a system and safeguard of international human rights build, perfected democracy greatly on the system thereby, this established the system measure that avoids most person despotic rule greatly. The another matter that reviews to democracy is, time of 20 centuries 60-70, in experience Mccarthyism of afterwar United States is mixed the suppress to chartism, jump over the failure of battle, and the antagonism of cold war period, world democracy progress is in low ebb, constituency participates in voting rate to drop, representative to the election democracy puts people generally in quite serious pessimism. In view of the lesson of afore-mentioned reasons and World War II, the theory that Euramerican democracy sends pair of right theory and bourgeois generation to discussed democratic system to undertake a series of profundity thinks over and critically. Of Europe thinking over is from the Marxism (basically be improved Marxism) begin, why the proletarian revolution that Marx points out not only did not happen, the society takes the way that parliamentary democracy makes, and does the the Democratic Party meet the German country society of the working-class support that represents social progress force choose Xitele appear on the stage? Democracy also can lack reason; Classic Marxism thinks the right is the uses ego to protect myth that bourgeois invents, but right idea came into being huge to be affected actively in 20 centuries, it forces egghead people think over how redefine right, give it the base of a progress. The free and democratic clique in the United States and other country also undertakes thinking over to the right. Their jumping-off place is not a Marxism, however classic latitudinarian the explanation to the right. The different of different of ideology chief position of this respect, thinking over basically is latitudinarian to the right, just, justice and politics redefine and explanation. ⑩ so, go up century after 70 time metaphase, democratic theory and democratic system have a lot of new, significant progress. After 80 time, after economic high speed develops the nation such as East Asia, power system also in succession to democratic system transition, urge the dilate that delivered the democratic system beyond western country. Nearly 30 old since, democracy achieved strong progress all over the world, perfected democratic theory greatly, deepened the people understanding to democracy and faith, abounded form of contemporary and democratic system. Although traditional democracy is made,continue to get intense critically, (11) but democracy is become inside limits of already alive bound cannot the principle of oscillatory society value, country and political system. Build from what bourgeois revolution generation views democratic system, achieve general progress all over the world to democratic today system, democratic system content is abounded greatly and developed. The development of democratic system is reflected not only what go up in domain is patulous, the form that more important is it and content had fundamental change. Sum up the development course of democratic system, develop street democracy from parliamentary democracy, (12) develops the public to participate in the more extensive society such as democracy of sex of business of type democracy chime then democratic form. The democracy of active each country already was the parliament that arises through the election not only discuss and decision-making, the effect that still includes interest group and street act, participate in extensively what be not governmental organization, media of the 4th influence is supervised omnipresently, had exceeded the democratic mode of vote parliament type. Democracy already was the configuration of system of a kind of state not only, and the lifestyle that still became configuration of a kind of society and broad public. After the characterization that very succinct essence wants was being made in the development of democratic to human society system and academic motivation, we need to also be done to democratic theory one history is narrated and analyse. Of Gu Xila " democracy is those who point to most person is regnant, this is in Gu Xila is an accepted standard in all politics composing. " (13) it is a kind direct, " most definitely " democracy is made. But be Gu Xila this kind simple " most definitely " democracy is made, the contradiction that brings about most person and small number of people -- nominal is most actually minority is deciding an issue, namely the conflict between elite of a few society and most citizen, of Gu Xila " democracy is made " the problem that did not solve good democracy truly from beginning to end, bring about city-state break down. (14) from bourgeois representative democracy develops modern democracy, democratic theory produced tremendous evolution. Democracy was experienced arrive from representative democracy " the election is democratic " , reappearance is exhibited " free democracy " and " law is democratic " process. Look from democratic formally, the democratic and academic core of bourgeois revolution times is representative democracy, it tries to be built through the election is delegate majority not only, represent all citizen however " true democracy is made " . In representative democratic theory Great Master John Mier looks, "To make sure most person is in the country has right to speak, and stripped completely the small number of people's suffrage. Press prevailing view, the small number of people must be subject to most person, but cannot think most person is after conquer small number of people from this, with respect to the right of representation that can replace a small number of people completely, ignore the small number of people's will. Contrary, in true democracy makes a state in, the person of each part ought to have its representing, small number of people and most person will get sufficient right of representation euqally, although be in proportion distributive. " otherwise, not be equality, just government. "Offend all just governments, disobey democracy to make above all. " (15) so, the democracy of inchoate bourgeois makes gist can generalize simply for: Most person decides, protect the small number of people's interest at the same time. The development of democratic tide, extended democratic range and deepness, offerred to people more and more the perspective that never is the same as angle fluoroscopy democracy and thinking. Xiong Bite of · of husband agreement a twenty-five-stringed plucked instrument (the theory of Joseph Alois Schumpeter) (the delegate that 16) is this respect development. He offers election democracy theory, caused a series of new democratic theory. He limits democracy with the election for the first time, think democracy is " a kind of system arrangement that forms political decision, it is under this kind of arrangement, the individual strives for people's vote to gain decision-making influence through emulative means. " (17) basis this one standard, whether is judging a country democratic system when, basically see its strong policymaker whether pass generation of fair, honest, fixed election, and this kind of election is with candidate it is OK free competition vote, every grown citizen enjoys equal voting authority to be premise. Of Xiong Bite " the election is democratic " the thinking that academic contribution depended on offerring the angle from the election to understand democracy to people, the essence that election definition is democracy. The election of fair, free, competition is judgement democracy of a country makes the most important mark, whether is making people can measure a country from the angle of voting procedure thereby democratic country. But, his theory just is traditional " representative democracy " a academic kind of new explanation, it is at that time the report of exceeding to democratic system pessimism, he thinks representative democratic citizen is in only of the election that momently ability exercise right, just be gubernatorial, other time is the ruled. Look today, his democratic theory is to comparative to be mixed one-sidedly narrow, our a few scholars are used just about " the election is democratic " academic blemish will atttack democracy wantonly. Democratic theory and democracy make the progress as human society, from 20 centuries there is tremendous progress after 70 time. The United States is famous politics home Robert Daer (Robert A.Dah1) put forward " multivariate and democratic " academic. He points out, democracy is a variety of interest group interaction, and participate in the core that is democracy extensively of the citizen, "Democracy is all grown citizens can share the political system that shares decision-making opportunity extensively. " (18) democracy is to be on national level not only, and be in place and basic level the participation of the diversity on each levels, democracy is the basiccest also be the participation that all members that the most essential condition is community above all enjoy equality the right with community decision-making collective. His important contribution is, introduce individual right and freedom democratic system. He thinks, compete and participate in not only and extensively democratically, and have real freedom, such as free speech, tong is free, say with its the political life that is democracy wants the end of implementation, still be inferior to saying is the requirement that realizes equal politics to participate in. (19) is in what make contribution to perfect democratic theory on same way is Carl Cohen, he puts forward " the public is participated in " democratic theory, democracy is people participates in the theory with decision-making politics. He says: "Democracy is system of a kind of society management, what in substantially of member of the society in this system can direct or indirect ground participates in influence ensemble member is decision-making. " (20) the point of view that he shares from politics, democratic to democratic character, implementation premise, method and condition made a system elaborate. The democratic degree of a country depends on the deepness that the citizen participates in, range and limits. This kind is participated in is vote not only, still include legislation and the course that share social work. (21) democracy is in theoretically on the development of century later period is " free democracy " academic. Joe Satuoli (Giovanni Sartori) is in his " democracy is talked newly " in the system put forward " free democracy " new theory. He says democracy can be only " the democracy that is dominated " , serve as gubernatorial minority namely, what this one established fact leaves the majority that is dominated is democratic. The majority that democratic key does not consist be being dominated masters personally and exercise politics influence, and a few what dominating at be being restricted effectively, such ability prevent individual dictatorship. Because he lacks confidence to representative democracy, so he puts forward, achieve democratic goal, the basiccest premise is to ensure the citizen's individual is free, it is political freedom above all, prevent to move toward oneself opposite democratically thereby: Most and absolute. Look in him, without the democracy of political freedom, not be democratic at all. His free democracy is from the analysis classic democracy sets out theoretically theoretically, to how preventing classic the malpractice of the despotic rule of most person in be being made democratically was made remedy. So, he put forward to be democratic theory of the foundation with individual freedom and equality, solved past democracy to make thereby long-term since not very good the settlement problem that how protects a small number of people. Come 20 years recently, democratic development is to show diversity trend, negotiate type democracy (Deliberative Democracy) theory is arisen beauty of popular Yu Ou is the progress with the most significant democracy. Negotiate type democracy to think, of public general affairs support by coordinated action definitely through talking things over is not to pass the way of money and influence to undertake, and negotiate decision-making participation to spend should as far as possible equality and extensive. Talking things over is the agency that achieves a society to coordinate through social value standard, tradition and language, it is system core with citizen society. (It emphasizes 22) democratic negotiation is gender, negotiation equal sex, open gender and responsibility sex. Negotiating type democracy is the representative democracy to be a foundation with the election and society the freedom that is a foundation thinks over democratically and develop. (23) if we are mixed theoretically to current democracy if the basic principle of democratic system does one summary to induce, it is to what democracy can make the following reply: Democracy is system of a kind of management. Among them ruler wants to be in charge of to the public in the behavior in public domain, this kind is in charge of is to build what holding regularly, all citizen freedom participates in, make public the election foundation with justice to go up; Democracy is decide with majority, respect individual and the right that protect a small number of people at the same time; Democracy is made avoid to make governmental power is centered in certain person or certain orgnaization hand, also avoid administration to have sovereign power, the place executes certain cent right and autonomy, be opened to people and local government also must be in charge of to people; Democratic government values people's option adequately, go up in each governments and the level that are not a government, what should involve people increase only is decision-making, the know the inside story that should assure people adequately counterpoises and share power, the redo after be being undertaken negotiation adequately by people gives a decision; Democracy protects the freedom of citizen individual adequately: The function with democratic first government is to depend on legal process and equal law to protect privilege, religion and belief are protective opinion on public affairs and expressive freedom, free, protect the everybody is equal right before law, protect people organization and the opportunity that share social politics, economy and culture life adequately; Democratic government follows law, follow proper order of law, attainder suffers judicatory to be protected effectively, need to execute judicatory independence for this, independent, the judge of professionalism can make adjudication independently lawfully; Democratic system abides by diversity, mirror characteristic of all sorts of different politics, society and culture life. The citizen has the equality that law guarantees to express the opportunity of apiration, multivariate creed, political course is to build in numerous and alternant jackknife, freewill organization rises, over private group of autonomy; Democratic society pursues the value idea of good-tempered, collaboration and compromise, democratic society realises, reach consensus to need compromise, even if cannot reach consensus constantly. (24) is visible, democratic theory and democratic system are in namely human society is carried out for a long time in, the development in thinking over ceaselessly and be being criticized, become better day by day. The democracy on present-day meaning is not any more those who resemble anti place simplification " majority is deterministic " , also not be one-sided " voting pattern is democratic " , it is one kind arises from national authority not only, national authority structure, to the national system that attainder protects, also be a kind of citizen enjoys sufficient freedom, share the way of life of society and public general affairs extensively. The person that talk democratically instead explains democracy one-sidedly with narrow ground for " majority is deterministic " and " voting pattern is democratic " , (25) denies people is participated in decision-making wait freely with safeguard a series of democratic and basic principle, if not be pair of democratic ignorance, it is the intended misrepresentation to democracy. 2, to democratic function correct those who respond to pair of democracy is critically, besides should clarify the water that is confused by them, even clear flow. Should be opposite to anti namely of democratic function and action all sorts of censuring try to refute. This respect has representative point of view is Professor Kang Xiaoguang " democratic bring calamity to the country and the people is talked " (of 26) and Professor Pan Wei do away with " democratic superstition " . I analysed two argument that teach negative democracy seriously, they have two main collective point, it is to be in theoretic, democracy narrow it is a few obedient majority with one-sided understanding. Health professor thinks, look from experience fact, democracy is a small number of people regnant and most person, so democracy is false, do not be worth praise highly. Professor Pan is flat it is democratic simplification " most definitely " . As a result of " most definitely " ever brought disaster to the mankind, (27) cannot be taken so democratically. 2 be go up from practice, they think to be in current China, political democratization won'ts do, and democratization also may not solves the problem such as imparity of political corruption, society and economic risk effectively. (28) is former it is academic problem, need makes some of academic illuminate, latter is practice problem, need more practice proof. (one) in democratic system " most " with " a few " no matter democracy regards system of a kind of state as configuration regnant and decision-making means, still regard a society as the method that public general affairs administers, it involves the processing of public general affairs, cannot leave the volition of majority and small number of people and interest question, a pair it is implementation democracy basic, lasting contradiction. It is simple that democracy makes the principle when deciding an issue: The volition that abides by most person decides an issue, this is general and accepted principle. Basically come from two respects to censuring democratically: Democracy is put in the danger of most person despotic rule; Democratic majority decides and pass without true implementation, it is the small number of people is deciding actually, much number theory is false. The despotic rule of most person is to make the biggest risk democratically, this is not a new issue, gu Xila appears put to death the democratic despotic rule of Socrates, yalishiduode is early the corruption that points out democratic system of government has the risk that becomes ochlocracy namely. Latter-day since, democratic despotic rule ever also caused human disaster for many times. Although democracy has this kind is dangerous all the time, but did not prevent human society to be mixed to democratic pursuit make progress to democracy. Apparent, democratic value greatly excel its dangerous sex, the disaster that arbitrary despotic rule brings to the mankind far very the despotic rule at most person. Besides, what modern democracy makes is perfect, no matter already still overcame the danger of most person despotic rule effectively from practice from theory. What is more,the rather that, modern democracy is made with it brand-new the mechanism changed simple in the past majority at all deterministic. Modern democracy is theoretically: The decision that follows most person and the right that protect a small number of people are the pillar of democratic system of government. Majority decides the principle is constituent government and a kind of way that decide public general affairs, not be the way that brings about suppress small number of people. Most clique, although be below democratic system, also should not strip the basic right of a few group or individual and freedom; Small number of people, no matter be,talk with belief of phyletic, religion, situation or income level, enjoy privilege safeguard, these rights are not gotten by government or any most cliques are privative. As to it is false to democratic majority censure, the person that talk democratically instead thinks: On the history never the democracy of the most person with right what, so most democracy cannot realize, so flat do not go after this kind of false democracy (29) really, we cannot conclude present democracy is made really whether to have real most decision, because, show some to all sorts of polling and vote make did not ask a content must have vote the absolute majority of all citizens is passed, such doing is unlikely to mix actual. Because be in,a system that values individual freedom issues you impossible, also did not need all people go ambitious approach voting. Democracy votes making is to press the opposite or absolute majority that joins the person that vote to decide an issue only commonly. Voting to attending or is not certain also. To doing not have the great majority that plays voting possibility we do not know their opinion, so, democracy is made whether true majority decides our have no way knows. But, we can be installed from the system only is a kind of system that can decide by most person. The essence that does not understand representative democracy by person democratically instead is arrangement of a kind of system, it is safeguard of a kind of program greatly. Democracy is made as same as absolute system perhaps be a small number of people dominating, but different is these " small number of people " be to pass due process to arise by popular wishes, the decision that they make is not an individual arbitrary and arbitrary, want to collect popular wishes according to due process however, their behavior should be supervised effectively by most person. Democracy depends on one cover the program that be affected by popular wishes and makes a decision to ensure, and do not depend on whether making a decision by majority or small number of people truly. Democratic proper sex depends on everybody accepted this kind of program, and the result that is not it certainly. But if most person does not agree with this result, can change this outcome. In Gu Xila's democracy, so called majority may is minority in total population, that is caused by the imparity of the class. In modern democracy, often also use " two more than half " the method decides an issue. Any societies also cannot force all citizens to participate in without method voting, in fact really cannot true majority decides an issue, democracy can have relative majority only forever, without absolute majority. But, cannot conclude democracy cannot be taken from this, be about to choose a small number of people to decide the system of most person destiny. If such, be absurd on logic, it is harmful in fact. The stand or fall of elite politics does not need a proof, also do not need to experiment again, there has been too much practice on human history. Is Chinese ancient time the union of intellectual elite and political elite? Elite politics theory still needs us today's scholar comes " invention " , try to carry out? To the democratic despotic rule of most person, there had been system sex arrangement in the development of democratic system. The biggest to be being made democratically after World War II perfect, created an effective system to prevent the despotic rule of most person namely. Among them a few the most principal institutions are: It is unconstitutional examine. What build like a series of countries such as Germany, Japan is unconstitutional the most effective system that examines a system to prevent most person despotic rule namely. It examines the legislation that enacts on behalf of most person by a few a few judges that have high reason, enact outrageous legislation in order to arrest most person; 2 it is in safeguard the law of human rights respect is strengthened greatly, individual right comes from the enroach on respect of government or other and most person in antagonism, get more efficient law especially judicatory safeguard. This respect U.N. and international society provided an efficient law and mechanism to ensure human rights; 3 it is media serves as the 4th kind of force, developing protection effectively the weak, safeguard justice, the action of supervisory government and powerful group; The action of the right that the effectively play such as round creed of organization of 4 dispute government, law protects individual and small group and defend oneself. 60 old facts had proved after World War II, mature state is made in democracy, the despotic rule of most person has gotten effective defense on the system. Of course, we still dare not say or state with certainty the occurrence that democratic system can boycott most person despotic rule forever. But, democracy can bring more lasting stability and peace than absolute system, although the despotic rule of most person also compares an individual to come fewerly with the small number of people's despotic rule autocratically, endanger with what cause on the history relatively fewer, these are the facts that do not dispute. Democracy is not an ideal system, however system of a defective. Democratic government also can make a mistake, but can correct in the shortest time. Corruption also can generate in democratic government, but can discover inside the shortest time. (2) democracy and social stability are democratically most the system that is helpful for social stability, this is the truth that is proved by world history place originally. But look in some people, democracy is considered as to imperil the system with stable society! One of prooves are a democratic transition country is not stable with China's latter-day convulsion end the disaster at democracy. This is to disregard completely the history and sum up historical experience erroneously. Williams Mu abdicate is in " why to want democracy " speech middle finger goes out, democracy has a kind of stability and flexibility, make a system can abiding go down. The information that passes election and popular wishes feedbacks, democracy is capable to be in maintain its lawful sex while, correct their flaw. Because other government form lacks a kind to make the peaceful way of their leader legalization, lack makes voting system mirrors popular wishes to change restrain and immanent and flabby calm. The people that a when democratic country can maintain peace main reason is this country has the right that criticizes their government, have the right of tong, the government is responsible to its people. Although democratic government is not the person that solve the defend of the problem between the country with peaceful way, but the world is more democratic, peace is more likely, this is remained correct. (30) absolute system is the source with human not steady society, this had had many historical fact to prove, and do not need to be proved with too much writing. Countless battles produce on human history main nothing more than two kinds of reasons, it is to contend for a city to sweep past the ground; 2 it is contention mastery. Main to the contention of mastery reason nothing more than: Be thought to lack lawful sex as a result of crown and easy be atttacked; Because dominate autocratically,cause the revolt of people to the cruelty of people. Because violent and armed strength contention, press, plot is assassinated,how many there is in the kingship replace in the past is, happen in palace coup. This kind of circumstance is particularly incidental in imperial times kingship successive regulation is changed to produce disorder period. By kingship successive and lawful sex suffers doubt, often bring about a large number of heroes and rise, the world big chaos. The history that the crown that gentleman does not see the history of absolute times is a cruelty contends for. Ancient Rome poet checks Wiener to say: "How an absolute oppressor can enjoy natural span of life hardly. " the person that archaic oppressor is counterpoised by seize more and Jesuit place unite, modern history the dictator that go up, kill for indignant people or sergeant place more. Research says, because the contention and rather than of kingship dies normally,the person that archaic emperor has 70% is. Human society moves toward democracy, it is the choice that makes through the ablution of blood and fire. Although democratic system has all sorts of corrupt practice, but go up in human phylogeny, it is proved to be first-rate political system, it is to restrain dictatorship and violent the most appropriate tool. (31) democratic system brings a society to stabilize is beneficial to people not only, also be best to the safety of highest ruler and life safeguard. Democratic regime has high stability, this also is be proved by world mordern history. The country waits in boreal Europe Sweden, Denmark since since building contemporary and democratic system, do not have war and social convulsion more than 300 years. Although Sweden is much party is made, but 80 old cause implement the social policy that is a foundation with equality at social the Democratic Party, great majority moment is in office by it, the society is very stable and harmonious. England from bourgeois revolution since, home also had not produced war and social convulsion. Press our logic, mysterious is the United States of America it is an inattentive federal, the country is advocated multivariate creed and latitudinarian, but be in 200 old histories, because of,divide slavery policy (the fight that is not contention hegemony) bring about " war of north and south " outside, without civil war happening, do not have bloody influence more contend for. The state that has a truly democratic maturity hardly can produce the violent contention of top advantageous position. Although also can produce the murder of pair of top leader in democratic country, but this is very accidental, (Although 32) happened to appear impossibly also the contention of influence is not stabilized with what cause a society. Below democratic government, any crises that top leader produces (because political scandal is brought about,be unmade or death of nature of abdication, leader, killing) unapt cause political power crisis and social turmoil, this makes the biggest profit democratically namely. Democratic society is stabilized, because governmental influence is transferred,be, undertake in orderly program normally. As the means of a kind of peace, freedom and Wen Ya, power struggle is defeated win and alternate is " mental sex " , and rather than " fleshliness " , it is temporary, and rather than is long. And the influence contend in autocratic society, often want to be ante in order to die: Coup, uprise or revolution, no matter hold together dominates to still overturn authority, all with " shovel evil Wu is used up " for the target. (Carl Cohen says 33) , compare with other regime photograph, democracy eliminates the necessity that settles social interior dispute with violent means more possibly. Democracy assumes some kind of obligation to encourage peace to settle dispute through developing participator not only, and creation makes resort force is become with achieving a goal one kind mix needlessly the unwise situation on the strategy. The channel that a few group of dissent expresses dissatisfaction and continues to pursue its objective always is expedite. No matter how does a few clique resent, also need not submit to humiliation, keep quiet out of fear, also need not resort revolution in order to achieve a goal. From each respect for, below sound democratic system, force is ego destruction, always be impolicy so lift. (The main argument that 34) thinks democratic meeting causes a society to be not stabilized is latin america country, southeast Asia country and our country the Republic of China the democratic chaos at the beginning of, this is completely a kind misinterpret. We know, absolute state produces convulsion easily, from making interim state to democracy autocratically also is unripe convulsion of extremely easy hair. After collapsing as a result of the authority of absolute system and order, the order of democratic system and law fail to build, not only aspirant, it is absolute the contention with democratic force also is very intense. Be in inchoate, the transition that makes democratically from absolute trend or the way that after the end dominates colony, go democratic not only endless and bloody. This is the most apparent on French history, france the bourgeois revolution of 18 centuries end, democracy is made cannot consolidate, performed convulsion of a society history: From " 3 class conference " , " national consortium " arrive " hot month government " and " government of superintend and director " , from " be in office Caesarean " , " 100 days of emergency " to " the restoration of a dethroned monarch other wave " , from Louie 16 to Ma La and Xialiai. Mexico dominates from Spanish colony after next independence, arrive from 1824 1848, happened 250 times coup and revolting, changed 31 presidents. These are the convulsion before moving toward democratic country to transform autocratically. The random of top authority alternate is mixed without lawful sex, make the source that it becomes social chaos to move. Although the price that there are such bloods on democratic road and lesson are choosing on the history, but cannot hold back the mankind to still select democratic system adamantinely. Why? Because, do not pay these price, the society won't have permanent stability and quiet. Absolute system can repeat bloody history forever. India is democratic those who be helpful for solving a society to stabilize is the strongest and paradigmatic. The democratic country that India is thought a few a few politics in dispute west world are stable generally. The famous Nobel economics of India of one's previous experience award gainer Amadiya Sen (Amartya Sen) says, when India is independent 1947, the country is in a disorder in. Government without test, politics is factional and bristly, social force be current. After half century, below the action of democratic system, political difference can be solved inside constitution frame, political power alternate also can transfer smoothly through democratic process. because of democracy, india just makes an unified whole. Pass democracy, india solved language and religious problem successfully. (35) India is mixed besides the force that the phyletic separatism with very deep germ of a few histories and religious sect conflict are caused outside be not being stabilized, politics leads the violent conflict of the layer and coup to did not happen, this develops the nation with same rate in congener economy, society, the circumstance photograph that often produces coup and social convulsion like the country such as South Asia, southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa is compared, it is a miracle simply. Parliamentary democracy of India made an all sorts of politics force bring into lawful political fight orbit, avoided large-scale violent revolution, military coup d'etat and social convulsion to happen thereby. In 13 general election that had held in heretofore, the smooth alternate that every time election assured national political power and the lawful sex that the government comprises. Alleviate and adjust what this behaved democratic system of government adequately to contradict to the society ability. (The case that those 36) attack can cause social chaos to resemble democratically is the example of the authority government that claims democracy is made, cannot make the system before democratic transition and democracy confuse sth with sth else, the corrupt practice that restricts blame democracy regards as the issue that makes democratically tries critically. The developing country does democracy to appear to be not stabilized is not the issue that makes itself democratically, however from can appear not to stabilize an issue to the middle of developing a process democratically autocratically. Make the principle likeness that development takes off to blast off with the satellite like the plane to democracy autocratically, the dangerous sex that take off and launchs phase is the biggest, ability is stable after orbit, won't appear commonly accident. , because we were fear of the danger when blasting off not to launch a satellite? True attitude is how to reduce the risk factor when blasting off as far as possible. Arrive contemporary, the thorough popular feeling that progress as human civilization and makes democratically, in be not democracy to make the transition that makes to democracy also slam the door force and bloody, shortened greatly the period of transition. A lot of countries avoided the society of transition period to be not stabilized. Transition of so multilateral like Russia and hamster home appears besides Romania bloody event, other did not appear serious force and bleed. Still have a lot of latin america states going up the democratic transition that 90 time complete the century, executed successfully transfer to the peace of democratic government from military political power (the Pinochet that includes to resemble Chile such martial dictatorship) . The democratization of southeast Asia area basically also is the process of a peace, include the Taiwan of Korea, Malaysia, Philippine, Thailand and our country. Visible, modern society, occurrence society of democratic society transition is queasy will reduce greatly with not stable circumstance. "Democracy is the method that the exclusive peace that human throughout history discovers changes. " (the place of necessary become reconciled that the economic success that the person that 37) is talked democratically instead often gains with country of a few authority will come explain authority is regnant. But, they ignored authority badly to dominate brought social chaos elephant and disaster. No matter be in latin america or southeast Asia area, authority is regnant period erupts ceaselessly social conflict and force, bleed incident, social pole is not stable. Korea contemporary history is a proof. From on the century arrives the fifties 80 time, authority is entered after Korea is independent regnant period. In this 30 old in, killing of Korea happening revolution, uprise, coup, politics and street protest, violent conflict and bleed incident is ceaseless. Although in Piao Zhengxi times economy has had rapid development, (38) but military dictatorship is regnant create a society extremely queasy, it is people pays enormous price not only, (39) is him ruler also neither one has good end. (40) till 1987, lu Taiyu executes politics to reform, execute a president to be chosen continuously, korea just ends the authoritarian and regnant history that relies on coup and killing to gain influence. To 1997 Jin Dazhong is chosen to be a president, came true to be in office in Korea the government that the party transfers political power to opposition peace. Present evidence makes clear, it is mature that the democratic system of Korea already tended. The fact proves, it is to make the social stability that brought Korea truly democratically, also bring security to political leader. (41) from 1997 after Korea democratization, korea society was experienced a series of severe crisis, the blow of the financial crisis 1997, lu Wuxuan's president appeared on the stage 2004 before long hind meet with instantly impeach case and disturbance of move the capital to another place, did not make Korea society appears any convulsion. Can say, the democracy of Korea is made had consolidated, force and killing had done not have the market, intense society contradicts and conflict can be below constitution and legal order clear up. (42) breaths out Folali Daimengde to say, democracy is the most extensive not only get the political system of extol, and also may be most the political system that stands fast hard. In all governmental forms, only alone democratic system of government is relied on enforce the least and agree at most. (43) (3) democracy and economy grow a few person that talk democratically instead a very powerful argument is, go against economic progress and efficiency democratically rise. Democracy causes distress easily. They think, be wrapped on the poor and not be right democracy is interested. Is democracy made whether be helpful for economic progress? Be in the world to go up is a very open to question topic. I think this is an issue that is proved very clear by the history. Look from the domain of international society, democracy makes a state is economic developed country, be not democratic country is economy backward country, this is a kind of objective fact. Why is democracy is made helpful for economic progress? Two stimulative economy develop the element that cannot deny: It is economic progress freedom of certain need economy and market compete, democracy is made offerred more advantageous system condition for this than other institution. 2 it is to be capital to developed the safety of indispensable property right to provide safeguard democratically. (44) saw because of the mankind democracy is made just about can bring economy to flourish this one huge profit and material benefit, this also is the main reason that the mankind comes to democracy go after as indefatigable target. The complexity of the problem depends on, "Democratic " country also may not can do well economy, be not democratic country also is not cannot do well economy. In the country of take off the economy, authority government acted important role. The Taiwan of Singapore, South Korea and our country is considered as power system to fall more the example that is helpful for expanding economy. "Latin America is changed " in China a lot of scholars look the pronoun that because execute democracy,often be considered as and brings about economy to develop difference between the rich and the poor of efficiency of backwater, lack, society. It is considered as democracy to go against economic progress and the strong proof that cause distress. Above all we must make clear Hunan, bring about " Latin America is changed " what the phenomenon appears is not democratic government, however military dictatorship dominates or authority government period. As it happens of these two kinds of example explains, authority dominates to push economy possibly to high speed development, push economy possibly also to break down. So, authority is regnant far the abidance that drives economy more likely without democratic government develops. Authority dominates to also just can expand economy below some circumstances. But, authority dominates to be done not have to economic development long but durative, and possible all one's previous efforts wasted, appear even retrogression. Chinese mordern history is a very good proof. China carries out Westernization Movement in acting 1860 clear government, governmental dominant expands economy energetically, to armour midday before Sino-Japanese war, the economic standard development of China and Japan has difference, but go up in same rate roughly. After China is overthrown in clear government because did not establish democratic system of government, cause chaos caused by war ceaseless, economy breaks down. And because Japan established democratic system of government, although appear,militarism suffers annihilative blow, but very rapid still development becomes world economy powerful nation. Japan is the first democracy is the most successful country beyond western country, also be the country with the most successful economy. the fundamental sex effect that can't this show to democratic system develops to economy? Why does authority dominate to develop to be not had to economy long but durative? The simplest immediate cause is not had with respect to the political system that is it but durative. Since latter-day and democratic system arises, as long as it is the country that consolidated democratically, its political power system basically lasts. The democratic nation that builds the earliest 200 come for years, political power is stable, economic society develops continuously, people lives and work in peace and contentment, country have to rich. The country of democracy of and rather than, political power swings in ceaseless quake, although had had high speed development of economy, a revolution or convulsion, economy is destroyed at once, people be confined to is catastrophic. Authority government can create a miracle temporarily, but won't have permanent brilliant. There also has been not little millennium on Chinese history, but in the smoke of gunpowder that disappears in the history. Resemble common sense of such a few histories, our scholar does not review, capture the country such as latin america, southeast Asia to be in democratic transition process however economic unsuccessful example, atttack democratic system wantonly, do not have conviction. Actually, latin america democracy concerns with what economy grows, not be to resemble some scholars place saying is democratic control and guide completely sent economic stagnation, however contrary, it is military dictatorship dominates the result that bring about. We know, latin america country is mostly dominate from western colony in 19 centuries of next independence, the country after independence built the republic of formally mostly, did not build democracy to make truly actually, however military bookman dominates alternately. To 20 centuries 559 time, country of latin america of American force infiltration, supportive soldier dictatorship is regnant, develop in latin america with force of communism of keep within limits. Make Latin America country enters the turbulent period of a vicious circle thereby, appear often military coup. The soldier is regnant the support that needs financial group or people, the military political power that appears on the stage so is not with financial group collude, it is agitate people, social policy if it were not for counterpoises money combines plunder sex, otherwise is populism. Difference of economic stagnation, the rich and the poor plays turmoil of corrupt and big, fascicular, society " Latin America is changed " the phenomenon is this period those who form. After cold war ends, the western country such as the United States supports the soldier over there to dominate no longer, turn instead and support democratization. So, 20 centuries 8, 90 time, latin america country begins to be on the road to democratization transition, appeared a series of democratic governments. Be these democratic governments just make a few countries better the economic crisis that the ground overcomes the past, make economy grows to healthy direction. (45) occupies the report of Economic Commission of U.N. Latin America, the economic increase rate of Latin America and Caribbean area was on average 2005 4.3% , among them Venezuela is achieved 9% , argentine 8.6% , chile and Uruguay are 6% . Edgar case of · Bo Ni (Edgardo Boeniger) is latin america democracy and governmental processing expert, (He is opposite 46) democracy of latin america country and authority government are evaluated to economic influence is special cogency. He says, in the economic reform process that democracy and authoritative system direct in solid quotations field, efficiency problem is a topic that has a controversy very much. He thinks, beautiful to pulling country, such argumentative cardinal principle is irrelevant. Because democracy is current be current at here area and the fact that makes work almost. Trade off study makes clear, although some of authority government had carried out successful transition, still prove oneself of power political power can raise the possibility of transition very hard. Current the case of latin america country does not support this theory apparently. (47) is in latin america, a lot of plan the most effectively with the reform that has perspective most, it is by hind authoritative democratic government institute carries out. Economic posse is confused when Argentine military affairs is regnant, (The 2nd democratic government that 48) heads by Meineimu controls inflation quickly, make economic trend is commercialized, occurrence economy grows, the situation with stable political situation. (49) Brazil also is to be in in executing the economy before democratic transition to be in the crisis, after passing transition of two governments democracy, economy reforms ability effective. Peruvian comparing democratization system next comparative undertaking economy is reformed that commercialize radically, (50) makes economy gains high speed growth and occurrence society stability. Chile is the country with latin america the most successful economy, chile Pinochet (the government executes 51) and the democracy later to commercialize reform intensely also is with civilian choose for the foundation, the politics that its successful key was offerring policy at democratic government and society just when quality, can carry out economy sturdily to commercialize policy with bold ground thereby, this is other state issues what cannot maintain for a long time. From Latin America country already some evidence, indemonstrable authoritative system compares democratic country on reform of aid of solid go by more businesslike. (52) democracy is having fundamental sex effect to economic progress, is not to prompt a concern directly, economic progress and legal system are having more immediate concern, more Laiyu legal system. But the development of modern economy or the democracy that need certain level are a condition, if authority of local autonomy, cent is mixed,decision-making diversity is the certain condition that economy grows. Centralization of state power cannot expand modern economy highly below absolute government. The experience of Chinese reforming and opening proved this. The system of centralization of state power of the height before our country reforming and opening and planned economy expands economy impossibly highly. The democratization after reforming and opening and power transfer to a lower level, it is the fundamental condition that economy grows. The experience that develops from Chinese region economy proves, the more the democratic, open, place that puts power, economic progress is better. The experience that if Shenzhen, Guangdong and Zhejiang are lukewarm,state economy grows proved this. The more the governmental power concentration, place that does not put power, economic progress jumps over lag. Ministry of Chinese Chinese and Western and northeast economy cannot very good development has a lot of reasons, but have a bit affirmation, do not change with the thinking of traditional centralization of state power and system about. The poverty of a few countries is inherent, or cause below absolute system, and less example can explain poverty is to be caused democratically. It is democratic and differ only will surely solve impoverished problem effectively. The value that makes democratically basically does not depend on solving economic progress and poverty. Democracy is made just develop creation condition for economy, democracy does not bring efficiency of peace of economic growth, society, management, free market necessarily. Because economy grows far more than democracy an element, the factor that still has law, management, natural condition and person. But, we can expect to appear systems of such a kind of politics, "The means organization government that it can assure to compete with peace, influence is communal policy; It can adjust society and economic conflict through fixed program; It and citizen society have sufficient tie, can represent the constituent of respective electorate thereby, the career that acts for collective gives commitment. " (53) is in democratic society, citizen politics right can avoid economic disaster effectively, it makes people has an opportunity to express their need, the public action with appropriate requirement. Government whether make reaction depend on greatly to the people's sufferings the pressure that comes from the people, the exercise of attainder can spur governmental action. The without which independent, democratic, state that has freedom of information has produced real be hard pressed for money. (54) says democracy is the system of least efficiency, it is the most powerful weapon that is used at atttacking democracy by person democratically instead. This is myopic to social progress, a narrow view. From the angle that the history develops, it is the most businesslike that democracy is made. Economic progress and social progress efficiency have the branch of short-term efficiency and long-term efficiency. Look from short-term and decision-making angle, it is the most businesslike autocratically, absolute person can the policy with major decision of one person clappers, and not " dispute over trifles each other " . But any absolute decision-making and inevitable meetings get the influence of bias, ambition, incapacity and expedience. Although enlightened absolute person the person that often also can seek wisdom comes assist a ruler in governing a country his decision-making. But, this can't be held back completely absolute person of selfishness and ignorance arbitrary. "In all regime, democracy arises the most possibly from it is well-advised policy in the long run. " (55) although " the democracy that the system changes is in decision-making on efficiency is inferior. But, once was made decision-making, they say to get more possibly carrying out fulfilling relatively. " (56) is absolute person mix curtly arbitrary decision-making, constant regular meeting ignores the interest with proper great majority, and cause numerous dissatisfaction, and cause potential boycott, this kind decision-making be unlikely to get carrying out fulfilling. More what is more,the rather that, absolute person decision-making error is very incidental. Once appeared strategical decision-making error, the likelihood is to cause stagnation of society, economy not only, and the retrogression that may be society and history. It affects economy and social progress is not, however ten years even tens of year. There are countless mistakes on Chinese contemporary history decision-making the case that causes social disaster. The efficiency of absolute regime and make a decision are obtained with high price. What its grand surface may conceal the anger of day of beneficial aggravate and dissatisfaction and foundation is not firm. (57) falls in democratic system, decision-making always not be correct certainly, but once break misunderstanding,faster ground is able to correct. Experience proves, democratic country is a developed country, its economic society develops degree far outclass to be not democratic country. Because,be, although make every,democratic system falls specific and decision-making without efficiency, but, because its decision-making less error is mixed,get more easily executive, make the society produces the development efficiency that lasts for a long time. And of absolute government decision-making often be in mistake and correct an error, do sth over and over again and revolve make a round trip in the loop of advancement and retrogression. Differ with authoritative creed political power, democratic regime still has the capacity of the regulation that adjusts his ceaselessly according to environmental change and system, they cannot generate an afore-mentioned profit instantly probably, however, than absolute political power, the hope that democracy achieves these goals finally should be gotten greatly much. (58) also expands economy effectively below absolute system, but, lack in clean-fingered " good government " with legal system diseased society falls, bring about serious corruption, difference between the rich and the poor necessarily. And the likelihood causes a society convulsion and break down. The economic progress below democratic system can avoid this kind of risk. Economic progress and democracy are concerned, also concern with legal system. Democracy is done not have in, but the legal society that tells custom to defend order, economy achieves high speed progress possibly also inside a paragraph of period. But it lacks abiding vitality. First rich hind democratic? Are democracy and economic progress degree concerned? It is economic height development brings democracy, still created economic miracle democratically? From the angle of the interest, wealthy person participates in government and political affairs with the poor have because of,move likewise. Wealthy person tends more conservative, do not hope to change, they hope to save existing institution more. The poor hopes to change more, hope to poll more. Just when they did not convey means and method, just take radical action. Economy grows and do not bring about democracy like that surely, resemble Hong Kong and Singapore. Democracy does not depend on certainly economy grows rate, depend on morely the interest that has an organization appeals to beg. After rich rate rises the society, the stability that develops democracy area of poverty of prep above society, democratic likelihood develops to appear to be not stabilized below great disparity of social the rich and the poor and class contradictory. Democracy is not premise with economic progress. Satuoli points out, in the time of a many century, show without evidence: The premise that has economy democratically or its put add to depend on economy grows and flourish. The problem depends on, the protection that national institute offers 19 centuries freedom offerred people does not have the demand of money side. With respect to free democracy regime regards a kind of politics as the form, a kind " impoverished democracy " can imagine likewise. (59) Amadiya Sen (Amartya Sen) also says, democracy is in the protection effect before calamity is more main to the poor, the victim to famine especially such. The person that has economic need needs to express political need likewise. Democracy is not general and rich the luxury after. Show without evidence the poor is below probable condition can reject democracy (India example of 70 time medium-term) . (60) China's current democracy develops a proof: Democracy is not economy developeds prosperous place is done, however the place with economic very general progress is done first. And rural person compares oppidan now more the requirement is democratic, enthusiastic to democratic participation taller. (61)(www.my-paper.info my paper)