Abstract: The property that had acquired a thing when us (substaintial or natural) know (exact understanding) when, the " of " final result that has been understanding. If ask attribute originates even what, with respect to ruin the effect by adding sth superfluous. I am in my " gravitation and broad sense celestial bodies of mechanical, whole " the begin in the article, expressed principle of my " attribute " , because be published on the magazine, did not discuss on this website, so, I am discussed more again on this network. I am in with a few also when " studies the person of the theory of relativity of " broad sense talks, if will consider from philosophical angle,I say my advocate. Normally report is " distains to consider " ground to say: What philosophy, what does philosophy carry on the head to use. Every time when I hear this word, I do not say the 2nd word, talked about other topic to get. Then I say the philosophy about " attribute " below, if you do not have the understanding of " of this " philosophy, you still study what science, still study what is relativistic! You do not have clear philosophical point of view, clear philosophical premise, be research of " blind " , study farfetched, does the pell-mell study. Do not know everybody to be when research, play an idea in viewpoint of some kind of philosophy certainly, of distinction is you only it is conscious involuntary still stopped. One, the philosophy about attribute one content (noumenon) the characteristic place that by its itself interior structure waits an element a moment decides attribute, be opposite from this content the body in the relation of his content comes out now. Have different concern, its attribute has different show. The relation has its relativity; Attribute has his absolutely sex. Violate attribute principle, cast the in-house characteristic of the object or attribute namely, note a concern only, or regarded the relation as attribute. Integral attribute is reflected not only going up to the relation of his content, also reflect go up in the relation to its part, and the property that its do not have this whole partly. Blame whole is contrary, its still have this property that is not whole partly, its attribute is reflected only going up to the relation of his content. This also is whole and the discriminative mark that are not whole. There is a kind of idea in logic, cent is noumenon (hypostatic) concept, relation concept and attribute concept. Still have the idea of mediacy actually, cent is relation noumenon concept, attribute noumenon concept and property concern concept. Attribute concept is absolute abstract speech commonly. (note: The classification of the notional " of this " mediacy is my research achievement on logic, there is this new classification in original logic, this is " of my intellectual " property right. ) ... ... 2, the property that had acquired a thing when us about mechanical concerned concept (substaintial or natural) know (exact understanding) when, the " of " final result that has been understanding. It is good to have a lot of people however " of " ruin the effect by adding sth superfluous, what to ask " even why " , " is what " . For instance: Newton the force that the counterforce of the outside force in the 2nd law is object itself (just be come out without report in its law, 3 law learn in my " force mirrorred in the law of broad sense force in " come out) , it is honest " action " . Force, force, it is the " of sex of " of be used to as a result of object itself (attribute) the reason is right the counterforce of outside force, this had realised " substaintial " , had been " final result " , which is somebody asks " force " even up to now came, not " of " ruin the effect by adding sth superfluous! ... ... " force " is pure relation concept. Push, attrition, collision is effect way, it is relatival, adding up with " force " still is relation concept, wait like thrust, impact force, and have the meaning of immediate effect. In " as a result of force " in this word, point to action not only, still have discriminative other at the same time kind the meaning of action, if distinguish,wait at heat radiation action. But as a result of,people often says " again when the action " of force, its meaning was changed easily to wrong meaning, virtually can produce power is consist in by the action of some kind of self-existent thing besides action other people, force became the pronoun of " of thing of some kind of " , right now, force became " of " noumenon concept, of this kind of wrong meaning changing often see over a lot of people. Why somebody is fond of gravitation of what " of " dummy " child, repulsion child " is waited a moment, also this mistake changes an element of thought reason. Mechanical still have a kind of power, wait like stretch force, magnetic force, force, call attribute force, it is property concern concept. Attribute force is to point to the reason as a result of object oneself attribute, the object that has some property is right the action of another object. Attribute force and in front the force of the pure concern that say is different, because its meaning is the reason of the action of action other people, the result that is not action and by action other people. However people does not have this distinction, caused a series of the disorder of thinking and the result with confused thinking. I am in my " the force that uses me learns 3 law to divide mechanical exercise in school work " in the article, mentioning " to contact force " is the meaning of " of force of " broad sense, contacting force is relation concept, and broad sense force is property concern concept. If be when solution problem not with attribute force be analysed only with pure relation force, easy thinking is confused. What I say to use me is new 3 law solve mechanical exercises to be able to become simple clear, also have this reason meaning. Because " is pure,relation " has " relativity " . Without the pure relation analysis of attribute concept, opposite " of easy " is confused. The somebody understanding to " relativistic " " is not clear about relative to " , also be the absolutely sex as a result of " of ignored " attribute. Of the object inertial the body that concerns external has two kinds, one kind is " force " ; Another kind is " motion " . Force is working relationship; Motion is pair of something (referenced department) " position " concerns. "Relation " has relativity. Be in my broad sense is inertial in 3 law, have broad sense inertial law; Inertial motion divides law of broad sense force and broad sense mensurably, it is the result as a result of this philosophy premise. "What concept is gravitation " ? Be pure relation concept? Still belong to sexual relationship concept? Say to forbid, everybody says to forbid. "Is bringing " attribute? If on the world only an object, does its " bring " who goes? "Is bringing " pure relation? So you or the understanding that do not have " attribute. So, only the notional angle from this section, gravitation is confused concept. However lamentable is, at present a lot of people still are hated to part with abandon " gravitation " . Do not throw, your thinking or meeting disorder can't bear! Who does that blame? "Field " is noumenon concept. Why? Because it has,do not depend on the characteristic that " exists by the existence of " of action other people namely. The " of " electromagnetic wave that radio place gives out (electromagnetism field) won't because nonexistent without the radio. The existence that somebody asks me this force and that force in the E-mail that gives me, I did not reply, I am bad also to reply, because " force " is not a " thing " (noumenon) , in object interplay when exist, when doing not have interaction nonexistent. "Bring concept of " of field of force or confused idea. And the meaning of concept of " of " gravitational field should understand so: The object has broad sense of a " inertial " attribute, gravitational field has to make object amid OK behave its inertial (heavy sex) attribute. And not be to weigh field of force to have " of " Shi Li absolutely the attribute at the object. If you do not think so, can cause such thinking disorder: Emphasize when you when the angle from " force " will convey, "Field " turned " into easily " of pure relation concept; When emphasizing the angle from " field " to convey, "Force " from why and come? Still return super- go over there the gravitation that spurs action, and " field " (or bend spatio-temporal? ) the meaning that did not exist again, and exceed spurring action still is baffling. Such confused results, be to often see in the comment that reachs a lot of people in a lot of current books. The disseminates speed view that somebody has " force " (gravitation wave? ) , "Force " became noumenon concept again, be " of thing of some kind of " , the " power that dummy what wants to cannot see forever in " of " cloud chamber again child " . In the history that develops scientificly, have how many dummy thing, be like phlogistic say, aether is waited a moment, its destiny how! The name of the homepage that the Zhuang Yilong that I saw Shanghai science and technology runs cadre institute on the net teachs is " theory inertial with inertial law " paper, I feel is me the " that I am close to most in all about content of " gravitation " articles that see is inertial the content of 3 mensurable " , he says: The object falls with the circumstance in the master piece outside sufferring, will maintain the divide evenly that still waits for momentum extent with edge gravitation fast circular motion. However regrettablly is, ground of ruin the effect by adding sth superfluous assumes what " repulsion child " . His definition already explore arrived the essence of " gravity (attribute) " , had been the final result of understanding. If the treatise above somebody had proper understanding, can feel " philosophy " to study medium effect in science. 3, the " of intellectual " system that has immanent logic namely theoretically more than 10 years before, the my famous to professor that studies broad sense the theory of relativity says: If my advocate comes to those who know " of " the theory of relativity from philosophical angle, he says very angrily to me, I no matter what philosophy, my computation was opposite, it is good theory, proved theory namely. People thinks Einstein computation was opposite " starlight spends " in the deflexion horn near the sun, somebody thought to prove his broad sense is relativistic, then I feel felt puzzled, einstein has published a name to be before the broad sense that did not establish him is relativistic " the effect that spreads to the light by gravitation " paper, had calculated in its paper " of its " angle, so, of " of this " angle confirming was to confirm this paper is academic, still confirmed the tensor later cites equation of field of force and spatio-temporal bent theory? Be attributed to broad sense the theory of relativity when us academic physics when, I do not object calling the physics that uses mathematical method academic physics, but give people easily a misdirect: Theory is mathematical equation, then after broaden the scope, what cause understanding easily to go up is extreme, ignored the attention of basic to theory idea, ignored the logistic impact between academic and underlying idea, however, call theory, its most important facet is the logistic relation of concept and concept. Derivation gets an academic mathematical equation again clever, " of what " strict solution is again strict, if its concept and notional system are such ground " is muddleheaded " , can you be a theory of " strict " ? Is the mathematical equation that there is precise physical meaning physics? Be still maths? The energy momentum tensor in the gravitation field equation of Einstein, without precise physical meaning, can you be successful academic physics? The academic meaning of the " of " academic physics that casts narrow sense, the meaning of the scientific theory of broad sense should be the " of intellectual " system that has immanent logic. Since be " system " , be being meant is the has a structure " whole " that has a lot of essential factor. So, confirm the problem is very complex issue theoretically, scientific philosopher people the cent of the academic " that has the academic " with good " and " difference, and the cent of the academic " that does not say to have the academic " with correct " and " mistake, depend on this manage. (somebody can ask: The earth's core says to be opposite namely with heliocentric theory the theory with the fault, how to explain? These two doctrine are not the theory about " attribute " , the " that is phenomenal administrative levels only judges the doctrine of property " . ) the " of a pure objective fact confirms " , cannot can prove theory simply, perhaps proved the certain element in this theory only. "The sun everyday eastwardly rise a " is this one objective fact to prove " the earth's core says " still proved " is meridian does the heart say " ? "Is the light in the deflexion " near the sun is this one objective fact to prove " is spatio-temporal the existence " that curved " to still confirm to there is " light to refract medium near the sun? 4, the admonition that serves as coda: (1) us now about respect of " gravitation " discuss, basically be discuss with what " inertial " of Newton is jumping-off place, one of source that this makes " of " outside force watch namely (the germ of epistemological respect, I am in proper when say again. ) . The mistake that outside force watchs causes chain of such malign thinking cause and effect easily: Outside force is created by another " thing " , the change of the athletic condition of another " thing " , it is cause by another outside force... , perpetual. Is the " particle " of the " of factitious " fiction of those people the result of catenary of cause and effect of so malign thinking. If you see somebody returns what particle of " dummy " , you can examine minutely him, by what force is the campaign of the particle of that " dummy " created again? So, must has one does not rely on " of " outside force and rely on him " the attribute of " and the thing of " of " active action. My inertial the " gravitational " in 3 law, rely on " attribute " namely (broad sense is inertial) of active action (it is impulsion, active with passivity it is opposite. ) . (should insist to show the world from world itself! ) the reason " that someone says to " force is condition of change object movement, this is the formulation that causes thinking disorder the most easily. Exact wording should be " outside force it is inertial " of change object " (had been broad sense inertial) the reason " of athletic condition. The " broad sense that if who is returned,with Newtonian " inertial " idea understands me is inertial " , that is not easy of course, but want " only new " trades a jumping-off place, very easy (brains take a sudden turn) . I say the high school student understands easily, because the middle school survives to did not form Newtonian " completely,be of inertial " " thinking calm situation "(www.my-paper.info my paper)